Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BooksB4Coins, post: 2560378, member: 36230&quot;]That&#039;s great, Jim. Well, other than the fact it wasn&#039;t about &quot;discussion&quot;. Kind of like how it wasn&#039;t about &quot;discussion&quot; when you decided to remove a LINK and talk down those simply asking for explanation, but you already know this (hence the deflection).</p><p><br /></p><p>Let&#039;s be honest here, shall we? Could it be that the only real problem with the thread in question was that you didn&#039;t like the subject? Fair enough, and to some extent I would agree, but you also set a precedent that you later refused to apply to yourself, and that, sir, is what this is about. There&#039;s a reason some have been questioning your approach, and contrary to what has been claimed, it&#039;s not your &quot;strictness&quot; but how you oh so selectively apply it.</p><p><br /></p><p>Spin however you see fit, but the proof of your double standard is right there, sir, and anyone who has been on the wrong side of it likely sees this for what it is.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in