Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Conder101, post: 1559807, member: 66&quot;]Well considering NGC&#039;s use of the * for superior eye appeal predates the use of the services + by almost ten years&nbsp; I would think that claiming the use of the + to indicate a statement of eye appeal&nbsp; doesn&#039;t hold water.&nbsp; And add to this the fact that ANACS was using a statement about superior eye appeal on their certificates back in the mid 1980&#039;s.&nbsp; And the industry was using + signs to indicate superior eye appeal back in at least the sixties.&nbsp; And all of these eye appeal judgements have been subjective.&nbsp; So unless he has some special technique for measuring the eye appeal of a coin and the measurements have repeatability, I don&#039;t think his AURA systems has any standing.&nbsp; if he is trying to claim the use of the + is his from a marking standpoint I think that can be tossed as well because people have used the + to try and indicate that their coin, product, whatever, is superior for decades.&nbsp; So I think the marketing claim doesn&#039;t have a leg to stand on either.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in