Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Extremely Disappointed with PCGS
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 3150927, member: 112"]It sounds like your acquaintance is claiming that if a big-shot send the coins in the coins will be treated differently than they will be if you send them in. Is that what you are asking for an opinion on ?</p><p><br /></p><p>If it is, he's wrong. The claim made by your acquaintance is one that is often repeated but it simply isn't true and never has been.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for other comment about the 2 Frankies, you think they should have gotten the FBL designation, but they didn't. I can't say if they deserve it or not without seeing the coins. </p><p><br /></p><p>What I can say is PCGS is and always has been more lenient when it comes to the special designations than NGC is. PCGS only requires the bottom row of lines be complete and unbroken (unbroken by both strike and contact marks) for the coin to get the FBL. NGC requires both rows of bell lines be complete and unbroken. </p><p><br /></p><p>I can also say that I have seen a great many Frankies slabbed by PCGS that were given the FBL that did not deserve the FBL. In point of fact most of them did not deserve it. So if they didn't didn't give it to your coins, then I can only assume the coins didn't deserve it, even by their lenient standards.</p><p><br /></p><p>But, by all means, post pics of them and we'll see.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 3150927, member: 112"]It sounds like your acquaintance is claiming that if a big-shot send the coins in the coins will be treated differently than they will be if you send them in. Is that what you are asking for an opinion on ? If it is, he's wrong. The claim made by your acquaintance is one that is often repeated but it simply isn't true and never has been. As for other comment about the 2 Frankies, you think they should have gotten the FBL designation, but they didn't. I can't say if they deserve it or not without seeing the coins. What I can say is PCGS is and always has been more lenient when it comes to the special designations than NGC is. PCGS only requires the bottom row of lines be complete and unbroken (unbroken by both strike and contact marks) for the coin to get the FBL. NGC requires both rows of bell lines be complete and unbroken. I can also say that I have seen a great many Frankies slabbed by PCGS that were given the FBL that did not deserve the FBL. In point of fact most of them did not deserve it. So if they didn't didn't give it to your coins, then I can only assume the coins didn't deserve it, even by their lenient standards. But, by all means, post pics of them and we'll see.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Extremely Disappointed with PCGS
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...