Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Experts needed: Die abrasion, die stage, and the 3-legged buffalo nickel
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="cpm9ball, post: 3346798, member: 24633"]Let me try to take a stab at this using my poor sense of logic!</p><p><br /></p><p>A die clash would be a particular stage in the lifespan of a die. Prior to the occurrence, the die might be considered flawless with some, or possibly no wear. After the clash, the condition of the die would continue to deteriorate, thus creating additional stages in its life.</p><p>A die abrasion is something distinctly different from a die clash, but it still identifies a particular stage in the life of a die.</p><p><br /></p><p>While both may be considered a variety because they have altered the intended design, that is not always the case. The "42 over 41" dime can rightly be considered a variety because it was intentionally altered at the Mint. The same can be said for the "O over CC" Morgan. However, the 2005-S KS Silver SQ was originally considered a Mint Error, a<b> "die gouge"</b>, and remained that way for about 7 years until it was changed to a<b> "die dent"</b> and became a variety listed in the CPG in 2012. Why? Don't ask me!</p><p><br /></p><p>Chris[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="cpm9ball, post: 3346798, member: 24633"]Let me try to take a stab at this using my poor sense of logic! A die clash would be a particular stage in the lifespan of a die. Prior to the occurrence, the die might be considered flawless with some, or possibly no wear. After the clash, the condition of the die would continue to deteriorate, thus creating additional stages in its life. A die abrasion is something distinctly different from a die clash, but it still identifies a particular stage in the life of a die. While both may be considered a variety because they have altered the intended design, that is not always the case. The "42 over 41" dime can rightly be considered a variety because it was intentionally altered at the Mint. The same can be said for the "O over CC" Morgan. However, the 2005-S KS Silver SQ was originally considered a Mint Error, a[B] "die gouge"[/B], and remained that way for about 7 years until it was changed to a[B] "die dent"[/B] and became a variety listed in the CPG in 2012. Why? Don't ask me! Chris[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Experts needed: Die abrasion, die stage, and the 3-legged buffalo nickel
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...