Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Jamericon, post: 666745, member: 18294&quot;]The OP is a great example of why amendments cannot always be interpreted to stand on their own. I am now in deep study of Federal Reserve notes, and the number of acts which amend the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 is immense. For me to write a research paper without considering all of them is just bad, short-sighted research - much like the OP&#039;s original comment. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>For E.O. 11110 to be useful, one needs to know the intention of the act it amended. E.O. 10289 gave the Treasury the power to act in certain capacities without the approval of the President. E.O. 11110 just added another to this list. The reasons are justified and explained very nicely in this link: <a href="http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/weberman/jfk.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/weberman/jfk.htm" rel="nofollow">http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/weberman/jfk.htm</a>, the same link posted in one of Number&#039;s posts above.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in