Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 2461941, member: 22331&quot;]It&#039;s my understanding that there isn&#039;t a published A.N.A. MS64 or + grade standard, so an argument would need to be presented for the nearest published grade which would allow proof of the coins grade parameters inclusion. Maybe you can provide the missing standard which my arguments will allow.</p><p><br /></p><p>MS65 was also selected as it&#039;s believed that&#039;s the first grade which distinguishes a separation wear statement where the initial believed only acceptable standard allowed for retribution or damages states MS60 is to be without wear. 5 grades difference to argue damages. An argument possibly distinguishing deterioration of the grading standards, that has been valiantly presented by Doug on numerous occasions.</p><p><span style="color: #00b359">&nbsp; </span></p><p>Your overwhelming perceived need to control, regardless of facts, is mystifying. Even as a hypothetical jurist you would disallow opposing arguments, or a verdict by the jury I addressed.</p><p><br /></p><p>I believe you would be ideal foil/counter in a debate, argued before an objective jury.</p><p><br /></p><p>As an admired frustrated opponent once said &quot;don&#039;t confuse me with logic&quot;. I&#039;ll try not in the future.</p><p><br /></p><p>Case Suspended!![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in