Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ethics of Posting Photos of Sold Coins
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Ed Snible, post: 7595814, member: 82322"]<i>Your</i> work is creative. I did not feel the need to mention it, but let me call it out. When I say 99% of coin photos are not creative, I am attempting to be precise. I believe 100% of all image-stack coin photos are creative. Anything with a weird angle or special lighting: creative.</p><p><br /></p><p>I see myself as being on your side. I think it is a pity that auction houses do not name photographers and catalogers. Some do, and we should encourage all the houses to start. (Lanz does!). If I write a book -- and it is seeming less and less likely -- I will make a serious effort to determine and name the photographer, even for corporate produced catalogs and defunct eBay accounts.</p><p><br /></p><p>I believe 99% of coin photos are not creative. That is no reason not to credit the photographer when known, but -- for me -- it is good enough to not hold back the photo when it cannot be cleared. But let's not take my estimates. I see 115,753 ancient lots on eBay right now. How many of those photos would <i>you</i> say are creative? 100%? How many have photo credits? If a unique coin sold on eBay, and the seller closed down his account, should that photo appear in future catalogs if another image cannot be located?</p><p><br /></p><p>I have an extensive photo-file of rare coins taken from photo files of auction catalogs. It is impossible to determine the photographer. 2/3rds of the firms have gone under and there is no way to determine who inherited the intellectual property rights from the firm.</p><p><br /></p><p>I use my real name here. I have no clue who [USER=88829]@lrbguy[/USER] or [USER=74968]@Orfew[/USER] are. 20 years from now, when CoinTalk is gone, how would I ever find you? There is little I can do to get photo releases for images I snagged off eBay in 2003. I believe the custom in numismatics is that unique coins get illustrated in reference works from auction photos, even if the photo can't be cleared.</p><p><br /></p><p>To be clear. The law books do NOT back me up. I have no more right to reproduce an eBay photo crediting a closed Eastern European account than I have a right to sell the Brooklyn Bridge. I suspect legal precedents are in my favor, but a lawyer in the group says no.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Ed Snible, post: 7595814, member: 82322"][I]Your[/I] work is creative. I did not feel the need to mention it, but let me call it out. When I say 99% of coin photos are not creative, I am attempting to be precise. I believe 100% of all image-stack coin photos are creative. Anything with a weird angle or special lighting: creative. I see myself as being on your side. I think it is a pity that auction houses do not name photographers and catalogers. Some do, and we should encourage all the houses to start. (Lanz does!). If I write a book -- and it is seeming less and less likely -- I will make a serious effort to determine and name the photographer, even for corporate produced catalogs and defunct eBay accounts. I believe 99% of coin photos are not creative. That is no reason not to credit the photographer when known, but -- for me -- it is good enough to not hold back the photo when it cannot be cleared. But let's not take my estimates. I see 115,753 ancient lots on eBay right now. How many of those photos would [I]you[/I] say are creative? 100%? How many have photo credits? If a unique coin sold on eBay, and the seller closed down his account, should that photo appear in future catalogs if another image cannot be located? I have an extensive photo-file of rare coins taken from photo files of auction catalogs. It is impossible to determine the photographer. 2/3rds of the firms have gone under and there is no way to determine who inherited the intellectual property rights from the firm. I use my real name here. I have no clue who [USER=88829]@lrbguy[/USER] or [USER=74968]@Orfew[/USER] are. 20 years from now, when CoinTalk is gone, how would I ever find you? There is little I can do to get photo releases for images I snagged off eBay in 2003. I believe the custom in numismatics is that unique coins get illustrated in reference works from auction photos, even if the photo can't be cleared. To be clear. The law books do NOT back me up. I have no more right to reproduce an eBay photo crediting a closed Eastern European account than I have a right to sell the Brooklyn Bridge. I suspect legal precedents are in my favor, but a lawyer in the group says no.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ethics of Posting Photos of Sold Coins
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...