Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SuperDave, post: 2737597, member: 1892&quot;]I lack issue-specific knowledge, but be aware that rarity is a moving target, always evolving. In many cases, the appearance of previously-unknown examples on the market - understanding they will <b>always</b> exist - can skew actual populations in a direction opposite the previous. The 1903-O Morgan is a fine example - at one time, the absolute stopper to a Morgan collection, the rarest of them all, fewer than a dozen known in Mint State. Then in October 1962 the Treasury released a few full $1000 bags of them....boom. </p><p><br /></p><p>If your empiric data holds, it&#039;s likely a case (a common one) where perception has not developed at the same speed as population.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in