Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="AWORDCREATED, post: 1807339, member: 52245"]Kinda sorta like if a 'mechanical' malfunction failed to feed a planchet and the dies clashed? "minor"  it is a matter of degree, and relative, an issue of magnitude, not either or.  And as Simon pointed out not a mint statement. If I understand correctly this statement "Just the fact alone that the Mint considers die clashes as normal precludes the label of "error". " is based only on your say so of your recollection of what you claim some tour guide said regarding what the mint considers? "but we don't consider it "  <--- you got a mouse in your pocket or you work at the mint? "effected " <--- has not affected this at all. Where does a wide AM fit into this?  Some one at the mint goofed up and used the wrong reverse, at the mint, in that building where they squeeze the metal. "normal part of the work day "  What does that even mean?  Just like when they don't don't notice clipped planchets, and all those other errors that slip past them.  what about wrong planchets or laminations? We need a good reference on what is and is not an error or a variety.[/QUOTE]