Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
ERIC update
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Sulla80, post: 3646132, member: 99456"]Some context , before I tread on potentially controversial ground. </p><p><br /></p><p>I love books, and ERIC is among the books that I find very useful - especially for it's compact representation of indices that let me easily scan types, legends, busts and images. If there were an Eric 2.1 in lighter weight volumes with the same information - I would buy it tomorrow to complement (no book is ever replaced) my hefty ERIC II volume, and its many bookshelf companions. I think it is fun to see ERIC III as a work in progress.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now for potential controversy: books are a very poor medium for the complex information space that we navigate. There are just too many axes/facets/dimensions from which one would like to research a coin or coins:</p><p>- date (44 B.C.)</p><p>- Emperor/person (Augustus, Cicero...)</p><p>- Symbols/icons (libertas, venus,...)</p><p>- Legend (IMP MAXIMIANUS AVG...)</p><p>- Historical event (first mithradatic war...)</p><p>- Condition (wear, patina,...)</p><p>- Literature reference (papers, books, journals,...)</p><p>- Author/researcher (Sear, Mattingly, Crawford, ...)</p><p>- Hypothesis (the elephant is or is not Caesar, Emesa is the mint, Parthamaspates is really Sanatrukes son of Meherdates, ...)</p><p>- Hoard evidence (Massagne, Beau Street,...)</p><p>- Location/place (Bath, Rome, Lyon, ...)</p><p>- Metal (AV, AR, AE, BI)</p><p>- Price range ($$)</p><p>- Rarity (issue, market, die counts, ...)</p><p>- Photographs/images</p><p>- Error types (centering, cracks, corrected, misspelled, brockage...)</p><p>- Provenance (who owned what coins)</p><p>- Discussion (debate and sharing of ideas)</p><p>- et.c. I could go on, but perhaps already overworking the thought</p><p><br /></p><p>As demonstrated in this forum daily - there is too much knowledge to allow anyone to be expert and up-to-date for a subset of ancients e.g."Roman Imperial" coins. An edited, crowd sourced electronic resource could be so much more powerful. A fresh, modern approach could, in my view, not only have powerful research implications, but also commercial implications. Imagine that you could now find for sale and buy a coin using a complex subset of these dimensions. Many of these dimensions can be searched today electronically, the glue between them needs some work.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Sulla80, post: 3646132, member: 99456"]Some context , before I tread on potentially controversial ground. I love books, and ERIC is among the books that I find very useful - especially for it's compact representation of indices that let me easily scan types, legends, busts and images. If there were an Eric 2.1 in lighter weight volumes with the same information - I would buy it tomorrow to complement (no book is ever replaced) my hefty ERIC II volume, and its many bookshelf companions. I think it is fun to see ERIC III as a work in progress. Now for potential controversy: books are a very poor medium for the complex information space that we navigate. There are just too many axes/facets/dimensions from which one would like to research a coin or coins: - date (44 B.C.) - Emperor/person (Augustus, Cicero...) - Symbols/icons (libertas, venus,...) - Legend (IMP MAXIMIANUS AVG...) - Historical event (first mithradatic war...) - Condition (wear, patina,...) - Literature reference (papers, books, journals,...) - Author/researcher (Sear, Mattingly, Crawford, ...) - Hypothesis (the elephant is or is not Caesar, Emesa is the mint, Parthamaspates is really Sanatrukes son of Meherdates, ...) - Hoard evidence (Massagne, Beau Street,...) - Location/place (Bath, Rome, Lyon, ...) - Metal (AV, AR, AE, BI) - Price range ($$) - Rarity (issue, market, die counts, ...) - Photographs/images - Error types (centering, cracks, corrected, misspelled, brockage...) - Provenance (who owned what coins) - Discussion (debate and sharing of ideas) - et.c. I could go on, but perhaps already overworking the thought As demonstrated in this forum daily - there is too much knowledge to allow anyone to be expert and up-to-date for a subset of ancients e.g."Roman Imperial" coins. An edited, crowd sourced electronic resource could be so much more powerful. A fresh, modern approach could, in my view, not only have powerful research implications, but also commercial implications. Imagine that you could now find for sale and buy a coin using a complex subset of these dimensions. Many of these dimensions can be searched today electronically, the glue between them needs some work.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
ERIC update
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...