Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SteveInTampa, post: 1081874, member: 27107&quot;]My email to Chad Hawk (PMG grader);</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><font face="Arial"><font size="2"><font face="Arial">Hello CHawk,</font></font></font></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Arial"><font size="2"><font face="Arial">I am a US paper money collector, and am a member of several currency forums, ( PMG, PCGS, Coin Talk, etc) and currently there is a thread running on ASK PMG concerning the EPQ designation being given to notes with pinholes. I&#039;m wondering how a pinhole can be considered &quot;normal wear &amp; tear&quot; ?&nbsp; Many collectors question this opinion, and have even gone to the extent of returning notes purchased after finding a pinhole in PMG notes graded with EPQ and finding out they have a pinhole. This is currently a HOT topic over on the Collectors Universe (PCGS) forum. Is there any way you could elaborate, or defend this decision ?</font></font></font></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><font face="Arial"><font size="2"><font face="Arial">Steve in Tampa</font></font></font></p><p>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in