Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Enough arguing! A Different Look at Grading
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 494569, member: 15309"]I would like to further illustrate my point using two coins that have vastly different strikes but the other elements of grading are essentially equal. I will revert back to Peace Dollars and the coin that started this discussion in my original thread. The first photo (courtesy of Anaconda) shows a well struck 1922 Peace Dollar graded MS67 by NGC. The surfaces, luster, and eye appeal are phenomenal. The strike is above average but not the best ever seen on a Peace Dollar. The second coin is the culprit (photos courtesy of Heritage). Again, phenomenal surfaces, blinding luster, and undeniably eye appealing, but the strike is one of the worst I have ever seen on a Peace Dollar, even for a 1924-P. This coin also grades MS67 by NGC. Now look at these two coins side by side and tell me with a straight face that they deserve the same grade simply because in 1924 the Philadelphia mint relaxed it standards and used lower striking pressure, larger die spacing, and overused dies.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/PeaceMS67.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/PeaceMS67h.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>I find it very hypocritical of the so called experts and leaders of the numismatic community to place so much emphasis on building a well matched set of coins across a series in similar grades and then make it virtually impossible to do so by using different grading standards for each year and mint with regards to strike.</p><p><br /></p><p>You guys want facts, here is a fact. One of these coins does not deserve and MS67 grade. And before you say that it does because of the strike characteristics of the year and mint, take a look at this 1924 MS68 Peace Dollar. </p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://coins.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=388&Lot_No=2350" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://coins.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=388&Lot_No=2350" rel="nofollow">http://coins.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=388&Lot_No=2350</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Now if the 1924 in the photo above had a strike like the one in the link above, I would have no problem with the assigned grade.</p><p><br /></p><p>The prosecution rests your honor!</p><p><br /></p><p>Paul[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 494569, member: 15309"]I would like to further illustrate my point using two coins that have vastly different strikes but the other elements of grading are essentially equal. I will revert back to Peace Dollars and the coin that started this discussion in my original thread. The first photo (courtesy of Anaconda) shows a well struck 1922 Peace Dollar graded MS67 by NGC. The surfaces, luster, and eye appeal are phenomenal. The strike is above average but not the best ever seen on a Peace Dollar. The second coin is the culprit (photos courtesy of Heritage). Again, phenomenal surfaces, blinding luster, and undeniably eye appealing, but the strike is one of the worst I have ever seen on a Peace Dollar, even for a 1924-P. This coin also grades MS67 by NGC. Now look at these two coins side by side and tell me with a straight face that they deserve the same grade simply because in 1924 the Philadelphia mint relaxed it standards and used lower striking pressure, larger die spacing, and overused dies. [IMG]http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/PeaceMS67.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/PeaceMS67h.jpg[/IMG] I find it very hypocritical of the so called experts and leaders of the numismatic community to place so much emphasis on building a well matched set of coins across a series in similar grades and then make it virtually impossible to do so by using different grading standards for each year and mint with regards to strike. You guys want facts, here is a fact. One of these coins does not deserve and MS67 grade. And before you say that it does because of the strike characteristics of the year and mint, take a look at this 1924 MS68 Peace Dollar. [URL]http://coins.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=388&Lot_No=2350[/URL] Now if the 1924 in the photo above had a strike like the one in the link above, I would have no problem with the assigned grade. The prosecution rests your honor! Paul[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Enough arguing! A Different Look at Grading
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...