Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;spock1k, post: 494237, member: 7043&quot;]well lets try it one more time <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>so you and i agree that a 2008 P and a 2008 D are 2 different coins?&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>next</p><p><br /></p><p>but we have not looked into how a 2008 P coin itself can be different if the dies are worn out and get replaced</p><p><br /></p><p>we acknowledge this in issues like the 1922 no D and the 1955 doubling where we see a visible difference but not otherwise.</p><p><br /></p><p>my proposal is we are making a mistake even 2 coins of hte same year and mintmark cannot be subjected to the same standards if they are made using different dies for the purposes of consistency now this is not very common in the usa </p><p><br /></p><p>but i am studying some coins here where there are 3 bangles on the hand and if the dies are worn the 3 bangles come close together and become a bracelet thus fundamentally altering the design now how should those coin be graded</p><p><br /></p><p>and what are your thoughts on that?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in