Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Enough arguing! A Different Look at Grading
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 494210, member: 112"]I'm not sure where this idea of a bell curve came from, but it sure isn't what is used. With a bell curve system you take the high and low as the extremes and everything else has to fall in between. </p><p><br /></p><p>By separating the coins by date and mint and judging them solely on that you remove any possibility of using a bell curve for you only use the best known for that date/mint. And all of the others don't have any impact at all.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Then I apologize Mike for I misunderstood you. You have continuously said that wished to form a composite and what is a composite if it is not an average ? That is the part that is confusing me.</p><p><br /></p><p>So if I understand you correctly, now, you are saying that you would take the S mint Morgans from say 1879 - 1882, for they are the best struck Morgans there are - and you judge all other Morgans based on that basis. Is that correct ? If it is correct, then I would agree that grades would definitely go down.</p><p><br /></p><p>I still do not agree that it would work because it would not be a fair system since the coins are not equal. It would be a biased system by definition.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 494210, member: 112"]I'm not sure where this idea of a bell curve came from, but it sure isn't what is used. With a bell curve system you take the high and low as the extremes and everything else has to fall in between. By separating the coins by date and mint and judging them solely on that you remove any possibility of using a bell curve for you only use the best known for that date/mint. And all of the others don't have any impact at all. Then I apologize Mike for I misunderstood you. You have continuously said that wished to form a composite and what is a composite if it is not an average ? That is the part that is confusing me. So if I understand you correctly, now, you are saying that you would take the S mint Morgans from say 1879 - 1882, for they are the best struck Morgans there are - and you judge all other Morgans based on that basis. Is that correct ? If it is correct, then I would agree that grades would definitely go down. I still do not agree that it would work because it would not be a fair system since the coins are not equal. It would be a biased system by definition.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Enough arguing! A Different Look at Grading
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...