Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
End of the Lincoln Cent ???
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Conder101, post: 8024052, member: 66"]Made out of what?? The standard CuNi clad that they use for the dime quarter and half won't work. A CuNi clad nickel would still cost 7 1/2 cents to make.</p><p><br /></p><p>The problem is they want any new material to allow a "seamless" introduction into the existing coins so they can be handled by the same equipment and without extensive modification of existing vending coin mechanisms. So the new coins can't be larger, smaller, thicker, heavier or lighter, and need to have the same electromechanical properties. They also need to strike up well and resist wear. It can't be done. Most coinage metals are the heavier elements, The cheaper abundant metals tend to be much less dense so to get the weight the same they are larger or thicker. Alloying with a heavier metal to get the size and weight right tends to either be a more expensive alloy or a much more difficult alloy to make which increases the cost. So far their best solution has been to stick with CuNi and reduce the more expensive Ni content and increasing the Cu. it works because Cu and Ni have almost the same density so the weight and size don't change. That was how the got the 4.9 cent alloy. But both Cu and Ni have risen in price since then.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Conder101, post: 8024052, member: 66"]Made out of what?? The standard CuNi clad that they use for the dime quarter and half won't work. A CuNi clad nickel would still cost 7 1/2 cents to make. The problem is they want any new material to allow a "seamless" introduction into the existing coins so they can be handled by the same equipment and without extensive modification of existing vending coin mechanisms. So the new coins can't be larger, smaller, thicker, heavier or lighter, and need to have the same electromechanical properties. They also need to strike up well and resist wear. It can't be done. Most coinage metals are the heavier elements, The cheaper abundant metals tend to be much less dense so to get the weight the same they are larger or thicker. Alloying with a heavier metal to get the size and weight right tends to either be a more expensive alloy or a much more difficult alloy to make which increases the cost. So far their best solution has been to stick with CuNi and reduce the more expensive Ni content and increasing the Cu. it works because Cu and Ni have almost the same density so the weight and size don't change. That was how the got the 4.9 cent alloy. But both Cu and Ni have risen in price since then.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
End of the Lincoln Cent ???
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...