Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Encapsulating a coin with active corrosion
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 20864813, member: 112"]In this manner - </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Ya see Charley, there's apparently more than a few things that you're not aware of. For example, Thad and I have known each other for many years, since long before he invented Verdi-Care. And Thad is very well aware that I have a great deal of respect of respect for him and his knowledge as a scientist.</p><p><br /></p><p>As a result of my respect for Thad I am way more than willing to defer to him and his knowledge of verdigris. But at the same time I have more than a little bit of experience with it myself. Which is precisely why I asked my question in my first post in this thread. That was the purpose of having the discussion.</p><p><br /></p><p>My experience has been that verdigris can be left on a coin for decades, and as long as moisture is minimized and dealt with, that verdigris does not grow or increase in amount. (Which is, in a way, what Thad is saying in his quote above.) Because verdigris itself is not the cause of corrosion but rather the result of it. In other words, the corrosion caused by moisture comes first, occurs first. Then and only then does verdigris form. </p><p><br /></p><p>What I was not aware of is this - </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>What this discussion has revealed to me, and hopefully everybody else, is that verdigris is kind of like toning in one regard. Namely that it never stops, cannot be stopped. But it can be slowed down to the point that it's virtually unnoticeable over the course of a collector's lifetime. </p><p><br /></p><p>As for the TPGs, they have stated since their inception that they will not slab and give a clean grade to any coin that has active corrosion on it. But yet they have slabbed and given clean grades to millions of coins with verdigris on them. In other words the TPGs were of the same opinion I was when it comes to verdigris, that it is not active corrosion. So rather obviously I was not alone in my opinion.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thad has shown me that I was wrong in my opinion about verdigris being inactive, but somehow I rather doubt that the TPGs will listen to him as I did.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 20864813, member: 112"]In this manner - Ya see Charley, there's apparently more than a few things that you're not aware of. For example, Thad and I have known each other for many years, since long before he invented Verdi-Care. And Thad is very well aware that I have a great deal of respect of respect for him and his knowledge as a scientist. As a result of my respect for Thad I am way more than willing to defer to him and his knowledge of verdigris. But at the same time I have more than a little bit of experience with it myself. Which is precisely why I asked my question in my first post in this thread. That was the purpose of having the discussion. My experience has been that verdigris can be left on a coin for decades, and as long as moisture is minimized and dealt with, that verdigris does not grow or increase in amount. (Which is, in a way, what Thad is saying in his quote above.) Because verdigris itself is not the cause of corrosion but rather the result of it. In other words, the corrosion caused by moisture comes first, occurs first. Then and only then does verdigris form. What I was not aware of is this - What this discussion has revealed to me, and hopefully everybody else, is that verdigris is kind of like toning in one regard. Namely that it never stops, cannot be stopped. But it can be slowed down to the point that it's virtually unnoticeable over the course of a collector's lifetime. As for the TPGs, they have stated since their inception that they will not slab and give a clean grade to any coin that has active corrosion on it. But yet they have slabbed and given clean grades to millions of coins with verdigris on them. In other words the TPGs were of the same opinion I was when it comes to verdigris, that it is not active corrosion. So rather obviously I was not alone in my opinion. Thad has shown me that I was wrong in my opinion about verdigris being inactive, but somehow I rather doubt that the TPGs will listen to him as I did.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Encapsulating a coin with active corrosion
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...