Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;clembo, post: 355732, member: 8033&quot;]Good stuff NP.</p><p><br /></p><p>I especially like point number 4.</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;4) The Purchaser has admitted that he has read the entire contract. &quot;Your description was deceptive.You only get the full story about you saying the description was wrong as you read your full ad.&quot; Yet, he makes the earlier statement, &quot;Your ad was also very deceptive and got past one of my buyers.&quot; He has admitted that he has committed contractual fraud by misrepresenting to you the identity of the individual you were dealing with. If he is claiming this individual as an employee, then the employee must have full authorization to have entered the contract on the company&#039;s behalf. If not, then that particular individual may be guilty of a crime. Notwithstanding anything else the Purchaser claims, his correspondence with you makes it clear that whoever bid on the auction did in fact have authorization, and thus is held to the contract as a whole. the Purchaser also further admits that his company&#039;s representative entered into the contract&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>Personally I will still list the occasional infoauction. I DON&#039;T use Paupal and if someone wants to fight over a $3 coin then go for it. When the coin is back in my hands I&#039;ll give you a refund.</p><p><br /></p><p>You made SO many good points NP. Magman, print and read them religiously. You have a lot of ammunition here.</p><p><br /></p><p>clembo[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in