JoeMoney sir I for one believe it is gold so as a representative of Spider I must respectfully say your response there is erroneous.
O.K. Spider, now I'm being serious! You were right and I never plated a silver dollar at the Mint. But, my son does auto trim and touch up work and has a system whereby he can gold, silver or bronze plate just about any thing. i.e.: radio antena, window trim, side moldings etc. So he and I did plate a couple of silver dollars with gold leaf and it worked to perfection. I think you answered your own question when you found no more difference in weight than .1 If it had been gold it would have been much greater than that. You could have also compaired the two coins with a six inch ruller and a pencil. Balance the ruler on the pencil and place the two coins on each end. I believe you will see very little difference, if any . Good luck.
Yes sir but he asked if "anyone" thought it to be gold and I do but you said no one does...Okay now I will say it again yes if it were pure gold it would weigh alot more but my explanation for this is that the core may be a lighter metal.
Well have fun but, what I said was NO I do not think so. Enjoy the thread and the chase as I am done with thread!
Okay but you'll be missing out on the celebrations once it is proven to be gold without a reasonable doubt!!!!!
Gold has many interesting properties aside from being heavy. Conductivity, durability, and that it can be layered as thinly as just a few molecules thick. That's thin enough to see through . That being said, is it possible to be a thin enough plating to not significantly alter the weight of the coin?
As I tried to explain before - that's the problem. For as you suggest plating, as a general rule is extremely thin. It typically adds less than fraction of a gram to the weight of a coin. But this coin is more than 7 grams heavier than it should be. Also - if the plating, regardless of the material used, was thick enough to add 7 grams of weight, the details and legends of the coin would be obliterated - you wouldn't be able to see them. But yet you can as shown by the pics. Which is why the only reasonable explanation I can think of is that the coin is a replica. That doesn't mean I am right - but the evidence provided rather supports the idea.
Having read most of this thread (and having learned a lot by having done so), quite frankly, I find it darn hard to find any holes in GDJMSP's logic. Given what is known about the coin I can't see how it could have come from a US mint. It seems to me that what is left to do is: 1) using methods recomended by lawdogct, determine if there is any gold content in the coin. 2) If it is gold (it would have to have a non-gold core) research what other private mints may have produce golden replicas of the Eisenhower dollar 3) if it isn't gold then you could still search for whether any private mints released any gold-toned Ike replicas, if it still interests you. I just seems to me that your next step is to confirm whether the exterior metal is gold or not. JMHO, Darwin
Yes that is true GDJMSP but then again if the planchet is made out of a large percentage of gold itself as I believe then there is your answer as to the added weight!!
NOS - Let me ask you a question - if it is made of almost pure gold, why does the silver color show through where the plating has worn off ?
Well, to answer your question in that regards my conclusion with that is that there is no silver color showing through but was probably a reflection from a bright light.
But Spider has the coin in hand - and he says the silver color shows through - and the pics show it as well.
See this post - 03-24-2005, 04:52 PM Post #42 well guys, i wonder if my local dealer could help for i am an amature, and ill start the bidding at $500 k I have noticed on some worn parts, a little silver shows, maybe plated btw, brand new scale and it was electronic