Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;areich, post: 1417439, member: 37479&quot;]<img src="http://i.ebayimg.com/t/1957-FRANKLIN-HALF-DOLLAR-0-50-PCGS-21727909-MS65FBL-COIN-UNIVERSE-125-/00/s/MTIwMFgxNjAw/$(KGrHqRHJEEE94gWt8S1BPhbHhn5oQ~~60_58.JPG" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Good Afternoon,</p><p><br /></p><p>Everything you said is valid.&nbsp; But looking at the facts on hand that we have, once the toning develops on the panatella of an artifact to this degree, it is almost impossible to get a view of the luster in photography.&nbsp; This was one of the things that surprised early photographers, but all the glisten and gleam that one sees with gold and silver that painters&nbsp; like Clasen faithfully reproduce is almost impossible to get with still photography because of the complete lack of movement of the camera, thereby recording a single angle of light.&nbsp; This image is consistent with a coin that has a possibility of real luster because the toning is rather even and then some of the marks might actually be stress lines possibly attenuated by rubbing in the slab.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>However, a strike this weak, I still find hard to believe is full bell.</p><p><br /></p><p>Amanda[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in