Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;NorthKorea, post: 2492955, member: 29643&quot;]The seller has sent me a follow-up message:</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;<font size="4"><b>SINCE YOU ARE WORRIED ABOUT THE COIN PLEASE DO NOT BID ON IT. I DO NOT WANT YOU TO BUY THIS AND TRY TO SEND IT BACK, THANKS, BILL</b>&quot;</font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4">In any case, here&#039;s a current DMPL that he has listed. I can see the reverse being called Proof like, but would that weird staining on the obverse preclude it from PL?:</font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4"><img src="http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/NlQAAOSwIgNXqqac/s-l1600.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> <img src="http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/LNsAAOSw6n5Xqqas/s-l1600.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4">I understand that, Markus. I meant that if the entire coin surface is mirrored, it would likely not get a DMPL or PL designation without the frosty devices.</font></p><p><font size="4"></font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in