Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Porsche2007, post: 1422114, member: 3757&quot;]You are correct; however, perhaps, you should have mentioned at least one of the valid contrarieties that is also present within the field of your final deduction. (I don&#039;t believe that your interpretation has sufficient, superior weight in order to obscure the contrasts.)</p><p><br /></p><p>The exclusion of ANACS would be similar to excluding the French Republic from the Group of Eight. France is no longer the nation that it once was, so let&#039;s simply exclude it because there are other countries above its current standards and general prestige. Yep...we shall defend the insurgent minority of young people that might buy, or invest, in France.</p><p><br /></p><p>To my judgement, the most secure investment in numismatics: die varieties. With physical damage in posteriority to certification, an assigned grade typically loses more value than a proven variety. Besides, there&#039;s a higher possibility of favorably crossing a variety than crossing a grade. A possible modification in grading standards might decrease the value of a certified coin, but it won&#039;t alter the variety recognition. In parallelism with these sentences, ANACS is indubitably the sole gerent in this base.</p><p><br /></p><p>I suppose that there are two principal, unethical points that were propagated by eBay:</p><p>1. It communicated the introduction of a set of &quot;high standards,&quot; by which a company could acquire the most pristine position in a particular category of sales, without presenting the standards. (Last time I checked, time is money.)</p><p>2. ANACS is recognized, at least until May 30 of this year (Gregorian calendar), amongst the most passable businesses in part of sales hosted by eBay; however, Paul A. DeFelice announced that they weren&#039;t made aware of the new standards that would eliminate the aforementioned business from its current position. (It would still be respectful to not alert PCGS and NGC, because there&#039;s no probable reason to believe that they will not remain in their position during the possible &quot;reintroduction&quot; of ANACS.)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in