Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;baseball21, post: 2908109, member: 76863&quot;]In Post number 628 you clearly state &quot;Well one member made a suggestion that he would like to see a Bean on it so I tried that...I didn&#039;t get a Bean because it wasn&#039;t a Proof, I didn&#039;t get a Bean because his team felt it was a 64 not a 65 so with that said any of you Guy&#039;s that feel that you want to know the Truth feel free to call Mr John Albanese of CAC I&#039;m sure he&#039;ll tell you guy&#039;s that want to look at photos and grade coins go find another Hobby that requires You to look at photos all day....&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>I can read and I can figure out what&#039;s going on which is the problem with your marketing attempts.&nbsp; You can knock off the garbage about people not wanting you to have a coin of that significance, no one cares who finds them if they are actually proofs.&nbsp; There&#039;s no conspiracy against you.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Your own words are that you &quot;...didn&#039;t get a bean because it wasn&#039;t a Proof...&quot;.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>PCGS has also publicly stated they want the coin back for a second look and you&#039;ve publicly acknowledged that you&#039;re aware of it.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>You&#039;re really just setting yourself up to get sued if you manage to sell it to someone for the five figures it would be worth if it was a proof.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in