Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;crypto79, post: 2652846, member: 24254&quot;]Yah your opinion isn&#039;t based on much fact.</p><p>It hasn&#039;t been proven to be not a proof, you might be able to say that it isn&#039;t the generally accepted proof die or that in an opinion it doesn&#039;t look like a proof but that isn&#039;t absolute evidence.</p><p><br /></p><p>If he sold it down the road as a penny in a proof 65 holder he wouldn&#039;t be liable for anything.</p><p><br /></p><p>If PCGS wants to call it a macanical error that doesn&#039;t mean that the seller can&#039;t sue for damages.</p><p><br /></p><p>If the seller sticks it in an auction doesn&#039;t mean PCGS can&#039;t pull it.</p><p><br /></p><p>The seller would be wise to remember the old adage that possession is 9th of the law and he&nbsp; is allowed to think PCGS got it right just as we are allowed to think PCGS got it wrong.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in