Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dmott88, post: 1268632, member: 33129&quot;]First off it you are going to compare anything or any coins please use the same certification company. That&#039;s like comparing a slasher zombie movie with a romantic comedy.&nbsp; I&#039;ve sent type 2 stuff to NGC and had it come back type 1 then bust it out and send it to PCGS and have it come back type 2. Of course there will be differences between the two hince why they are different companies.</p><p><br /></p><p>Sencondly, I personally believe its all market grading versus standard grading. If you can withhold a large client base who when they recieve a coin they say &quot;Wow, I think this coin would grade higher if I certified it.&quot; Or whatever they choose to do with it. I much rather have that then a small or no client base that says &quot;Hey, this coin is way overgraded!&quot; Exactly, like the majority said about the original thread was about. If they were indeed Rare, or Gem , or AU I think the mass populace of ebay would be wise enough to pay more than melt. But as previously mentioned he was almost spot on before the fall. </p><p><br /></p><p>Also, the dies were much weaker in the late tens and twenties. Books are littered with information explaining how they were made and what is struck weak. When grading coins these anomalies and differences in the minting process must be viewed and judged accordingly. </p><p><br /></p><p>We all have our views and differences when it comes to grading. We can as a majority disagree or agree or even have a few people versus a lot of people. That&#039;s the beauty of this site and Nusmatics.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in