Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Troodon, post: 342968, member: 4626&quot;]The buyer doesn&#039;t pay, open up a complaint, and relist the item, problem solved.&nbsp; Annoying, but you haven&#039;t actually lost anything but time, you still have the item in your possesion, you&#039;re not out the final value fees (those are refunded) and you&#039;re not out the listing fees if you relist it and it sells the second time.</p><p><br /></p><p>Buyers who get too many non-paying complains get NARU&#039;d anyway.&nbsp; No need for negative feedback.</p><p><br /></p><p>Just don&#039;t send the item unless and until the buyer pays.&nbsp; Same way a brick and mortar store works... short of shoplifting or robbery the store owner doesn&#039;t have to worry about how trustworthy his customers are as he&#039;ll just withhold his merchandise until the buyer pays.</p><p><br /></p><p>Taking that into consideration I just don&#039;t see the point of buyers having feedback at all.&nbsp; There&#039;s already a process to dump the bad apples without the need to brand buyers with negative feedback.&nbsp; Buyers&#039; feedback is already irrelevant... after this change, even more so... and now buyers with legitimate complaints need not fear retalitory feedback.</p><p><br /></p><p>And again, let me reiterate that I find it rediculous that the ones who are giving away their money to buy an item, to someone they don&#039;t know and can&#039;t even see, have to prove that <i>they</i> can be trusted.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in