Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
EBay Got This Absolutely Right (for a change)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="NPCoin, post: 652099, member: 5629"]I am confused by this statement? What do you mean by "eBay forum sub-contract"? Are you claiming that eBay is a party to the legal sales contracts that a buyer and seller enter into, and that eBay is not "just a venue"? If they are not "just a venue" then I am sure there will be a lot of legal problems for them in the near future.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Is this your own quote, or something eBay has placed in writing? If it comes from eBay, I would very much like a link to it, please.</p><p><br /></p><p>I am wondering if anyone has yet even read the court opinion on the matter that I linked to. I have seen opinions that a seller not securing insurance, or demanding the buyer secure it, is illegal or mail fraud. Yet, those opinions are not supported by citation. On the other hand, a court precedence on the issue has been posted, but it seems to have been disregarded and ignored.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you really want to know what a court has to say about all of this, read the opinion posted previously (for those that do not understand the terminology, it is the ruling made after the trial, including the reasoning behind the ruling).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="NPCoin, post: 652099, member: 5629"]I am confused by this statement? What do you mean by "eBay forum sub-contract"? Are you claiming that eBay is a party to the legal sales contracts that a buyer and seller enter into, and that eBay is not "just a venue"? If they are not "just a venue" then I am sure there will be a lot of legal problems for them in the near future. Is this your own quote, or something eBay has placed in writing? If it comes from eBay, I would very much like a link to it, please. I am wondering if anyone has yet even read the court opinion on the matter that I linked to. I have seen opinions that a seller not securing insurance, or demanding the buyer secure it, is illegal or mail fraud. Yet, those opinions are not supported by citation. On the other hand, a court precedence on the issue has been posted, but it seems to have been disregarded and ignored. If you really want to know what a court has to say about all of this, read the opinion posted previously (for those that do not understand the terminology, it is the ruling made after the trial, including the reasoning behind the ruling).[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
EBay Got This Absolutely Right (for a change)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...