Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Ebay Doubled Die Test
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="jallengomez, post: 1722177, member: 19748"]Sorry for the delayed response. It's been a long night. Ok. The answers:</p><p><br /></p><p>1. No. Mechanical doubling from a shifting die during the strike. And some poor sap paid over $16 for it.</p><p><br /></p><p>2. Yes. One of the strongest Class V doubled dies in the series(or any series for that matter). It's also a very affordable example due to the number of coins struck by this die.</p><p><br /></p><p>3. No. Again, MD. One clue is that it also shows on the mint mark. On pre 1990 Cents, the mint marks were added after the hubbing of the die, so the mint marks were unaffected by any doubling that happened to the die.</p><p><br /></p><p>4. No. Another strong example of MD.</p><p><br /></p><p>5. Yes. A classic example of the type of Class IV + Class VIII doubling that we are seeing on the modern single squeeze die hubbings.</p><p><br /></p><p>6. Yes. Another Class V, but much more subtle than what we see on the 1995 listed above. On this circulated example, the doubling is best seen as notches on the G in GOD and the U of TRUST.</p><p><br /></p><p>7. No. Once again, the Doctor is in the house. MD. MD that shows on the face confuses a lot of people.</p><p><br /></p><p>8. Yes. An example of Class II doubling. This type of doubling can be confusing because it can appear almost shelf-like. Look for the subtle separation though and the fact that it adds to the normal thickness of the devices.</p><p><br /></p><p>9. Yes. Class VI distended hub doubling. This is another one that can be tricky. Although this example shows up as very strong extra-thickness on the tail of the 9 in the date, Class VI extra thickness is often much less obvious. Circulated coins can often show devices that appear extra thick from circulation wear and from damage. This can fool a lot of people into thinking they have a Class VI doubled die. Look for sharp devices that don't appear flattened or "mushroomed".</p><p><br /></p><p>10. No. This is die deterioration doubling which can occur as a die ages. Unlike MD which cuts into the devices, deterioration doubling will appear as a ghostly shadowing of the devices.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks to everyone who participated. Hopefully it was educational and hopefully no one here was the unlucky bidder on any of the worthless examples. I'll address a couple of the comments that were made sometime tomorrow.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="jallengomez, post: 1722177, member: 19748"]Sorry for the delayed response. It's been a long night. Ok. The answers: 1. No. Mechanical doubling from a shifting die during the strike. And some poor sap paid over $16 for it. 2. Yes. One of the strongest Class V doubled dies in the series(or any series for that matter). It's also a very affordable example due to the number of coins struck by this die. 3. No. Again, MD. One clue is that it also shows on the mint mark. On pre 1990 Cents, the mint marks were added after the hubbing of the die, so the mint marks were unaffected by any doubling that happened to the die. 4. No. Another strong example of MD. 5. Yes. A classic example of the type of Class IV + Class VIII doubling that we are seeing on the modern single squeeze die hubbings. 6. Yes. Another Class V, but much more subtle than what we see on the 1995 listed above. On this circulated example, the doubling is best seen as notches on the G in GOD and the U of TRUST. 7. No. Once again, the Doctor is in the house. MD. MD that shows on the face confuses a lot of people. 8. Yes. An example of Class II doubling. This type of doubling can be confusing because it can appear almost shelf-like. Look for the subtle separation though and the fact that it adds to the normal thickness of the devices. 9. Yes. Class VI distended hub doubling. This is another one that can be tricky. Although this example shows up as very strong extra-thickness on the tail of the 9 in the date, Class VI extra thickness is often much less obvious. Circulated coins can often show devices that appear extra thick from circulation wear and from damage. This can fool a lot of people into thinking they have a Class VI doubled die. Look for sharp devices that don't appear flattened or "mushroomed". 10. No. This is die deterioration doubling which can occur as a die ages. Unlike MD which cuts into the devices, deterioration doubling will appear as a ghostly shadowing of the devices. Thanks to everyone who participated. Hopefully it was educational and hopefully no one here was the unlucky bidder on any of the worthless examples. I'll address a couple of the comments that were made sometime tomorrow.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Ebay Doubled Die Test
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...