Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Ebay article: 7/09 COINage- Faked Out
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="NPCoin, post: 628645, member: 5629"]Very true. And the judge will also be giving you, as the jury, specific instructions on point of law or to disregard certain aspects of the evidence or testimony presented. The jury does not have the option to simply disregarded these instructions.</p><p> </p><p><br /></p><p>Yes, but and investigation can lead to a number of possible outcomes including a simple closure of the investigation for no wrong doing, a lawsuit brought by the government against eBay, or simply a consent decree settling the matter.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>They have policies in place to "protect the buyer". As far as negligence is concerned, your definition may not match that of the jury. I am curious how you view that eBay has itself financially harmed you? If you are referring to losing money to a seller that has committed fraud against you, it is that seller that has done the financial harm. The sales contract is between you and that seller, not you and eBay. As far as your last point, Federal Courts have already determined that eBays policies and implementation against counterfeits is already sufficient. i do not see where the breach of duty has occurred.</p><p><br /></p><p>See, the biggest problem is that eBay has really not committed illegal or unlawful acts as determined already through current actions and investigations. The primary reason I have read is because eBay does in fact have policies in place and they implement said policies. Some of the policies may not be enforced to our liking, but that does not necessarily denote negligence on their part.</p><p><br /></p><p>That is not to say that there are not significant problems with eBay, as I have noted in the past. When bad seed makes bad decisions, it sometimes takes time to correct policy and implementation to the higher standard expected by some. I am not trying to defend eBay, except for the fact that we should be fair in our assessment of them and their activities.</p><p><br /></p><p>Furthermore, if people are truly having so many unresolved issues and problems with eBay, I still fail to see why said people are <b>still</b> refusing to write the Attorney Generals' Offices in California and their own respective States on these issues. Like you said, things will happen if people start complaining more and more, but if nobody is complaining or not complaining to the right people, then nothing will happen.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="NPCoin, post: 628645, member: 5629"]Very true. And the judge will also be giving you, as the jury, specific instructions on point of law or to disregard certain aspects of the evidence or testimony presented. The jury does not have the option to simply disregarded these instructions. Yes, but and investigation can lead to a number of possible outcomes including a simple closure of the investigation for no wrong doing, a lawsuit brought by the government against eBay, or simply a consent decree settling the matter. They have policies in place to "protect the buyer". As far as negligence is concerned, your definition may not match that of the jury. I am curious how you view that eBay has itself financially harmed you? If you are referring to losing money to a seller that has committed fraud against you, it is that seller that has done the financial harm. The sales contract is between you and that seller, not you and eBay. As far as your last point, Federal Courts have already determined that eBays policies and implementation against counterfeits is already sufficient. i do not see where the breach of duty has occurred. See, the biggest problem is that eBay has really not committed illegal or unlawful acts as determined already through current actions and investigations. The primary reason I have read is because eBay does in fact have policies in place and they implement said policies. Some of the policies may not be enforced to our liking, but that does not necessarily denote negligence on their part. That is not to say that there are not significant problems with eBay, as I have noted in the past. When bad seed makes bad decisions, it sometimes takes time to correct policy and implementation to the higher standard expected by some. I am not trying to defend eBay, except for the fact that we should be fair in our assessment of them and their activities. Furthermore, if people are truly having so many unresolved issues and problems with eBay, I still fail to see why said people are [B]still[/B] refusing to write the Attorney Generals' Offices in California and their own respective States on these issues. Like you said, things will happen if people start complaining more and more, but if nobody is complaining or not complaining to the right people, then nothing will happen.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Ebay article: 7/09 COINage- Faked Out
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...