Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Early Lincolns vs Modern Lincolns
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="SuperDave, post: 2390963, member: 1892"]It was just too tough to strike well, too much eagle detail directly opposite features on the reverse which also needed deep strike there. That's why the eagle's head and tail are so often weak. Well-struck coins killed dies quickly, and the copper-nickel alloy didn't help. The move to smaller letters in 1858 - and shallower relief - was intended to help alleviate this problem but didn't do enough.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="SuperDave, post: 2390963, member: 1892"]It was just too tough to strike well, too much eagle detail directly opposite features on the reverse which also needed deep strike there. That's why the eagle's head and tail are so often weak. Well-struck coins killed dies quickly, and the copper-nickel alloy didn't help. The move to smaller letters in 1858 - and shallower relief - was intended to help alleviate this problem but didn't do enough.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Early Lincolns vs Modern Lincolns
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...