Early Lincolns vs Modern Lincolns

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Omegaraptor, Apr 4, 2016.

?

Which one do you prefer?

  1. Classic Lincolns

    38 vote(s)
    92.7%
  2. Modern Lincolns

    3 vote(s)
    7.3%
  1. Omegaraptor

    Omegaraptor Gobrecht/Longacre Enthusiast

    Which design do you prefer more?

    I prefer the early one because it seems to be made better and has higher relief.

    I'll just put out there that the cutoff for classic/modern, in my opinion, is the same year that the Walking Liberty Half ended, in 1947.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2016
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    See, for us older guys, you gotta' be plainer...you mean shield vs memorial or vs wheat
     
  4. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    Wheat ......
     
  5. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    I would assume op means the wheats to be the classics.....

    Regardless, wheats all the way. Especially the ones prior to 1920.
     
  6. Omegaraptor

    Omegaraptor Gobrecht/Longacre Enthusiast

    True, they just seem to be made so much better than the new pennies.
     
  7. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Actually for the designs, I enjoyed the "special" ones they issued in 2009.
     
  8. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

    Wheat!

    With the exception of Lincoln on the Obv. that shield cent reminds me of a 3rd world country coin. Could never get my mind wrapped around that design. Hell, I don't even know what the shield represents! As an American collector, I should probably know that. I never bothered looking it up. It doesn't even look American to me. JMO.
     
    BadThad and Paul M. like this.
  9. tommyc03

    tommyc03 Senior Member

    Any of the cents up to 2009. The shield cents lost any kind of meaningful detail, especially on the obverse.
     
    BadThad, Paul M. and TJ1952 like this.
  10. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    I liked all of the dead President issues up until they changed to low relief but bottom line, a well struck Lincoln Wheat can't be beat. :)
     
    tommyc03 and Omegaraptor like this.
  11. serafino

    serafino Well-Known Member

    Flying eagle beats them all :)
     
  12. Omegaraptor

    Omegaraptor Gobrecht/Longacre Enthusiast

    Why this series lasted for two years is beyond me.
     
  13. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    It was just too tough to strike well, too much eagle detail directly opposite features on the reverse which also needed deep strike there. That's why the eagle's head and tail are so often weak. Well-struck coins killed dies quickly, and the copper-nickel alloy didn't help. The move to smaller letters in 1858 - and shallower relief - was intended to help alleviate this problem but didn't do enough.
     
    serafino and tommyc03 like this.
  14. Omegaraptor

    Omegaraptor Gobrecht/Longacre Enthusiast

    Kinda like the St. Gaudens $20 in 1907, but with that they managed to make it easy to strike by flattening it enough.
     
  15. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    Part of good coin design is understanding the interplay between obverse and reverse designs, and how metal moves & fills features during the strike. You can plan for it somewhat, but you won't really know how it strikes up until you actually strike them. Lincoln Wheats had a big problem with this as well - note how often you see the upper left quadrant of the reverse weakly struck, directly opposite the lower left of the bust on the obverse. There just wasn't enough planchet metal available to fill all that area away from the center of the coin, that quickly.

    Almost all coin designs can work if you strike them slowly enough. Not all work at production speeds.
     
    tommyc03, serafino and Paul M. like this.
  16. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

  17. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    I agree that it's not a great rendition, but you do know where it came from, right? We're not going to get the actual original design back, and while I still think it could be improved on, it's a heck of a lot better than, say, the 2009's. Not so dear or honest ole Abe had become a laughable cartoon, even more than in real life, and was an insult to Brenner.

    The OP question, as asked, is a little more complicated than pre/post 1947, which is an odd choice anyway. The obverse design alone has visibility changed many times over the years, so unless we want to break everything down, perhaps it would be easiest to simply identify by reverse variety. Even though not a personal fan of the series, I would choose wheat backs, and mostly because they include the obverse design used in the early years, which is far more eye-pleasing and superior to anything that came later imo.
     
  18. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Wheats! All you have to do is look at Lincoln. Nothing compares to 1915, 1916, and 1917 Abes!
     
    Evan8 likes this.
  19. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    I like the Memorial series best. It has produced the most interesting varieties and errors in Lincolns by far. It makes for a very interesting and collectible series. I also enjoy the fact that most collectors and dealers ignore and disregard the series. It permits generally low prices making the series affordable to all.

    EDIT - I failed to vote because the poll is not setup correctly. I absolutely can't stand the shield cents! By far the worst design even, chosen by committee and most likely because of production concerns.
     
    Paul M. and Kentucky like this.
  20. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    Nothing against memorials, ive looked through tons of them, but from a details standpoint....

    ...This is truth.

    2016-02-16-12-11-35.jpg
    1916 NGC.jpg
     
    RonSanderson, mark_h, JPeace$ and 3 others like this.
  21. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

    Great coins. What are the grades of those two?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page