Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Early Frisian Gold – the Dronrijp Triens
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Roerbakmix, post: 8339193, member: 100731"]Thank you all for the positive replies!</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I must admit some hesitation. But, my collecting 'philosophy' is pragmatic: I started with 100€, and since then, all my coins were bought by selling with profit. In fact, my net balance is still positive <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Thank you [USER=96898]@Orielensis[/USER]. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>It certainly is (both the fascination and the high expenses), but though I obviously can't prove it, I believe these little coins will retain their value. It's sad indeed how little can be stated with certainty on the Friezes. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>You're obviously right. Upon closer inspection, mistook the A (at 5 'o clock) for a runic letter, which it isn't. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Not at all (the nitpicking). I don't mind being corrected, and you obviously know more about the topic than I do. I planned to write a more sound article, but couldn't find the time to do so, and thus compiled all snippets of information I remembered into one post. </p><p><br /></p><p>Also, [USER=84905]@Tejas[/USER], your tremisses are absolutely stunning. I thought [USER=73099]@Nap[/USER] and I were the only here with a special interest in early medieval coinage. I have a couple of questions though, especially on the THRASAMVND tremissis:</p><p>1) I think I can read TR.IECTOFIT on the obverse, and NRAS(rotated)EMVNP? on the reverse; is that correct? </p><p>2) I couldn't find any information on this type, and didn't know about it beforehand. Do you have any documentation or links for further reading?</p><p>3) The coin is attributed to Maastricht (I guess because of the TR.IECTO FIT?). Doesn't this make it a Merovingian coin, instead of Frisian? </p><p>4) Also, historically, there has been some doubt whether or not the TRIECTO (e.g. those of Madelinus or Rimoaldus) refers to Maastricht or Utrecht. </p><p><br /></p><p>Wonderful toning also on the Madelinvs! I believe it's a Pseudo-Madelinus, i.e. a (probably Frisian) imitation of the DORESTATVS. </p><p><br /></p><p>Finally, could you give some background on the last coin? </p><p><br /></p><p>I wish Arent Pol would publish his findings in some form ...[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Roerbakmix, post: 8339193, member: 100731"]Thank you all for the positive replies! I must admit some hesitation. But, my collecting 'philosophy' is pragmatic: I started with 100€, and since then, all my coins were bought by selling with profit. In fact, my net balance is still positive :) Thank you [USER=96898]@Orielensis[/USER]. It certainly is (both the fascination and the high expenses), but though I obviously can't prove it, I believe these little coins will retain their value. It's sad indeed how little can be stated with certainty on the Friezes. You're obviously right. Upon closer inspection, mistook the A (at 5 'o clock) for a runic letter, which it isn't. Not at all (the nitpicking). I don't mind being corrected, and you obviously know more about the topic than I do. I planned to write a more sound article, but couldn't find the time to do so, and thus compiled all snippets of information I remembered into one post. Also, [USER=84905]@Tejas[/USER], your tremisses are absolutely stunning. I thought [USER=73099]@Nap[/USER] and I were the only here with a special interest in early medieval coinage. I have a couple of questions though, especially on the THRASAMVND tremissis: 1) I think I can read TR.IECTOFIT on the obverse, and NRAS(rotated)EMVNP? on the reverse; is that correct? 2) I couldn't find any information on this type, and didn't know about it beforehand. Do you have any documentation or links for further reading? 3) The coin is attributed to Maastricht (I guess because of the TR.IECTO FIT?). Doesn't this make it a Merovingian coin, instead of Frisian? 4) Also, historically, there has been some doubt whether or not the TRIECTO (e.g. those of Madelinus or Rimoaldus) refers to Maastricht or Utrecht. Wonderful toning also on the Madelinvs! I believe it's a Pseudo-Madelinus, i.e. a (probably Frisian) imitation of the DORESTATVS. Finally, could you give some background on the last coin? I wish Arent Pol would publish his findings in some form ...[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Early Frisian Gold – the Dronrijp Triens
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...