Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Marshall, post: 2544617, member: 21705&quot;][ATTACH=full]545784[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>This is the obverse rotated to match up with the Reverse. I&#039;m using the rim damage to align the obverse. There is a feint double image both in front and behind the profile and I&#039;m trying to see if the stuff going on under the chin is a clash mark or more doubling. </p><p><br /></p><p>Like other series, doubling can be cause&nbsp; either by the die or by mechanical means during the strike. I believe there is also a third method which causes a very light doubling, but which I cannot remember right now. </p><p><br /></p><p>But if it is a clash mark, it should line up with the reverse used at the time the clash occurred. I&#039;m not certain of the exact location of the clash marks Breen described as &quot;double clash marks before and behind the neck&quot; on his die State S-92 State I and our 7.02.</p><p><br /></p><p>This particular coin is called NC-1 Die State II which should be the same as S-92 Die State II or our 7.03. I&#039;m looking for markers to find the best example of die state 7.02 which should have the clash marks without the development of the spike on the 9 of die state 7.03.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m hoping to determine whether the clash marks are from reverses H or I or both.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in