Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jaceravone, post: 362081, member: 9474&quot;]There was no other doubling on the coin. That was the first thing they looked for if there was any doubling anywhere else. If there were, then I may have had a double die, but since there wasn&#039;t any, the conclusion was a re-punched mint-mark. The doubling that you saw in the photos was from either a slight blurring of the pics and/or some very slight mechanical doubling. I can still take the pics if you want. Just let me know.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Also, if you look at my original pics - you will see a tail that looks like it coming from an &quot;S&quot; on the left lower part of the mint-mark.&nbsp; It is much more pronounced when holding the coin in hand and kind of difficult to photograph it, but it does show up a little in the original pics.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in