Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
EAC people, critique please
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="mac266, post: 2457151, member: 26371"]As you may have seen from other posts, I'm just branching out into EACs. In the past three weeks, I've read 5 or 6 books and watched 5 videos from the ANA library. I've decided to start with late date large cents just to get the feel for copper, because they are much more affordable than some other, earlier series. I bought a copy of the Newcomb book, too.</p><p><br /></p><p>I went to a coin show the other day with a wallet full of cash, intent on making my first purchase. Let me explain the coin and my thought process, and show you some pics, and then invite you to critique me as a way to build my skills in evaluating copper.</p><p><br /></p><p>One other note. I went ahead and bought the Nikon D3300 we talked about in another thread. However, I have yet to invest in a macro lens or other equipment that will enhance my numismatic photography. These pics are the best I could muster with the standard 15-55mm lens provided with the camera, and without a tripod or other stand. I will continue to acquire photographic equipment and work on my skills, but right now, these are the best I could do.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is what I bought:</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i64.tinypic.com/dfugk3.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i64.tinypic.com/t00vvn.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Here is my thought process:</p><p><br /></p><p>I'm using, "Grading Guide for Early American Copper Coins" as my bible.</p><p><br /></p><p>Sharpness (i.e. technical grade): The dealer told me it had been in a PCGS slab marked as MS-62, but he disagreed with the grade and cracked it. He had the coin marked as AU-58. When I examined the coin through my 10X loupe, I agreed that its sharpness did, in fact, rate a mint state grade. There is absolutely no wear on the coin whatsoever. You probably cannot see this in the pics, but through my loupe it's very apparent, so for now you'll have to trust me.</p><p><br /></p><p>Color: The color in my pics is close to the actual coin, but not exactly. In hand, the coin almost exactly matches the "chocolate brown" depicted in the book. To me, it has lots of eye appeal.</p><p><br /></p><p>Surface: I saw three impairments to the coin. First is a small nick in the field to the right of Liberty's head. Second is a carbon spot to the left of the bust. Finally, on the reverse, there is some slight discoloration in the "E" on the reverse. These are all very small, minor impairments, but using the "net grading" process used by EAC, it does drop the coin down below its Mint State technical grade.</p><p><br /></p><p>Net grade: Although the coin has a sharpness (technical grade) that puts it in the Mint State range, I assessed its net grade to be AU-58. The dealer and I agreed on a price of $145.</p><p><br /></p><p>What say you copper people? Please critique my grading abilities and thought process so I can improve my skills. When I consult numismedia, it shows I got the coin for a steal. Does the current market reflect that, too?</p><p><br /></p><p>Lastly, I attributed this coin as being the N-8 variety by using the Newcomb book. Am I correct?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="mac266, post: 2457151, member: 26371"]As you may have seen from other posts, I'm just branching out into EACs. In the past three weeks, I've read 5 or 6 books and watched 5 videos from the ANA library. I've decided to start with late date large cents just to get the feel for copper, because they are much more affordable than some other, earlier series. I bought a copy of the Newcomb book, too. I went to a coin show the other day with a wallet full of cash, intent on making my first purchase. Let me explain the coin and my thought process, and show you some pics, and then invite you to critique me as a way to build my skills in evaluating copper. One other note. I went ahead and bought the Nikon D3300 we talked about in another thread. However, I have yet to invest in a macro lens or other equipment that will enhance my numismatic photography. These pics are the best I could muster with the standard 15-55mm lens provided with the camera, and without a tripod or other stand. I will continue to acquire photographic equipment and work on my skills, but right now, these are the best I could do. Here is what I bought: [IMG]http://i64.tinypic.com/dfugk3.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i64.tinypic.com/t00vvn.jpg[/IMG] Here is my thought process: I'm using, "Grading Guide for Early American Copper Coins" as my bible. Sharpness (i.e. technical grade): The dealer told me it had been in a PCGS slab marked as MS-62, but he disagreed with the grade and cracked it. He had the coin marked as AU-58. When I examined the coin through my 10X loupe, I agreed that its sharpness did, in fact, rate a mint state grade. There is absolutely no wear on the coin whatsoever. You probably cannot see this in the pics, but through my loupe it's very apparent, so for now you'll have to trust me. Color: The color in my pics is close to the actual coin, but not exactly. In hand, the coin almost exactly matches the "chocolate brown" depicted in the book. To me, it has lots of eye appeal. Surface: I saw three impairments to the coin. First is a small nick in the field to the right of Liberty's head. Second is a carbon spot to the left of the bust. Finally, on the reverse, there is some slight discoloration in the "E" on the reverse. These are all very small, minor impairments, but using the "net grading" process used by EAC, it does drop the coin down below its Mint State technical grade. Net grade: Although the coin has a sharpness (technical grade) that puts it in the Mint State range, I assessed its net grade to be AU-58. The dealer and I agreed on a price of $145. What say you copper people? Please critique my grading abilities and thought process so I can improve my skills. When I consult numismedia, it shows I got the coin for a steal. Does the current market reflect that, too? Lastly, I attributed this coin as being the N-8 variety by using the Newcomb book. Am I correct?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
EAC people, critique please
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...