Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;goldducat, post: 1433009, member: 37873&quot;]Doug knows it already, I will write for rest of you - this is not 3rd lowest mintage ever. With 3605 pcs minted this coin is quite common in comparison with these ones:</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; GEL 1797 - 420 pcs (found only in Krause, don&#039;t mentioned in&nbsp; &nbsp; Besier&#039;s Mint reports and not listed in Delmonte)</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; HOL 1591 - 560 pcs (listed in Besier, but added in Delmonte&#039;s&nbsp; &nbsp; supplement with correct R4 grade, missed in his first book) </p><p>HOL 1806 - 526 pcs (known fact, R4 grade)</p><p>HOL 1614 - 2800 pcs (found only in Delmonte&#039;s supplement without rarity grade, Besier wrote &quot;40 mark in common for single and double ducats - it is weight of 1400 double ducats or 2800 single ducats&quot;)</p><p>WFR 1774 - 3220 pcs (Medemblik Mint) (listed only in Besier)</p><p>ZWO 1674-1683 (1760 pcs during 10 years period according to mint documents, in fact ducats were struck in two years, listed correct in Delmonte as 1774 and 1776, both with R3 rarity)</p><p>ZEL 1683-1685 (3 yrs, ducats and double-ducats in common) - 49 mark&nbsp; &nbsp; (3430 pcs of SINGLE ducats) * </p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ZEL 1687-1688 (2 yrs, ducats and double-ducats in common) - 42 mark&nbsp; &nbsp; (2940 pcs of SINGLE ducats) **</p><p><br /></p><p>* Delmonte supplement listed it as 1715 pcs in common! Probably&nbsp; &nbsp; wrong, it has to be only two ducats and no single ducats at all to receive 1715 pcs from 49 mark&nbsp; &nbsp; of gold. But Delmonte listed single ducat of 1683 as R2 rarity in the same book.</p><p>** The same. Delmonte supplement listed it as 1470 pcs in common!&nbsp; &nbsp; Probably wrong, it has to be only two ducats and no single ducats minted to receive 1470 pcs&nbsp; &nbsp; from 42 mark of gold.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in