Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 870377, member: 112&quot;]Mike I have no doubt that all 4 of the coins I posted had at least some net grading, 2 rather obviously had more of it than the other two. However, all 4 of those coins had problems, and those problems were severe enough that none of them should been put in problem free holders. </p><p><br /></p><p>I guess my point is that if the 2 nicer coins deserved to be net graded down to F12, then the other 2 deserved to be net graded down to G6. They weren&#039;t deserving of the F12 even if they&#039;d had no problems. </p><p><br /></p><p>So I have to say that the inconsistency is there Mike and there&#039;s no excuse, no accpetable reason, and no explanation that justifies it. </p><p><br /></p><p>And by the way, that coin in the NCS slab deserved to be in that problem coin slab. I can&#039;t make out any signs of the cleaning other than coloring, so I&#039;ll have to trust them on that count. But that scratch is enough all by itself.</p><p><br /></p><p>You ever see a Walker or a Frankie with a scratch like that slabbed ? No, and you won&#039;t either. Every one of them will be bagged. And so should the early coins. Damage is damage - and I don&#039;t care what coin it&#039;s on.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in