Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Doug's 2015 $5 to $100 list
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2287992, member: 19463"]I believe the process of surface enrichment is considerably over stated. It does no good on good silver. I would not expect the layer to be thick enough to do more than make the color better. When can it be proven to start? Certainly it was used when the content approached billon but not when they were using Sterling or coin silver. The observation is that Flavians in the market are more often worn. Are you saying that coins of the next century that are that worn just don't make it to market because no one wants them but they are as common? I do not have references for things I was taught when I started in the hobby. Maybe it is an old wives tale. </p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.totalmateria.com/page.aspx?ID=CheckArticle&site=ktn&NM=239" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.totalmateria.com/page.aspx?ID=CheckArticle&site=ktn&NM=239" rel="nofollow">http://www.totalmateria.com/page.aspx?ID=CheckArticle&site=ktn&NM=239</a></p><p>This page states that alloys finer than sterling are too soft for practical use. </p><p><img src="http://riograndeblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/CAllendenHardness3.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><a href="http://riograndeblog.com/2012/11/metal-hardness-how-to-measure-it-and-why-it-matters-for-silver-alloys/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://riograndeblog.com/2012/11/metal-hardness-how-to-measure-it-and-why-it-matters-for-silver-alloys/" rel="nofollow">http://riograndeblog.com/2012/11/metal-hardness-how-to-measure-it-and-why-it-matters-for-silver-alloys/</a></p><p><br /></p><p>The above chart shows hardness increasing until it flattens off at about 80/20 where it stays until about 30/70 which is borderline billon. I'd say 30% silver would certainly benefit from surface enhancement but that's not to say it would not before that. This is a question to ask a metallurgist, not me. Another matter is the chart covers AR/CU alloy but coins were never just two metals. It would make a difference whether the 80% silver coins had a mix of other metals that would add or subtract hardness. I know there are coin collector type people into this sort of question since there is a Yahoo group on metal. I am a member but do not read every post.</p><p><a href="https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/numismet/info" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/numismet/info" rel="nofollow">https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/numismet/info</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2287992, member: 19463"]I believe the process of surface enrichment is considerably over stated. It does no good on good silver. I would not expect the layer to be thick enough to do more than make the color better. When can it be proven to start? Certainly it was used when the content approached billon but not when they were using Sterling or coin silver. The observation is that Flavians in the market are more often worn. Are you saying that coins of the next century that are that worn just don't make it to market because no one wants them but they are as common? I do not have references for things I was taught when I started in the hobby. Maybe it is an old wives tale. [url]http://www.totalmateria.com/page.aspx?ID=CheckArticle&site=ktn&NM=239[/url] This page states that alloys finer than sterling are too soft for practical use. [IMG]http://riograndeblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/CAllendenHardness3.jpg[/IMG] [url]http://riograndeblog.com/2012/11/metal-hardness-how-to-measure-it-and-why-it-matters-for-silver-alloys/[/url] The above chart shows hardness increasing until it flattens off at about 80/20 where it stays until about 30/70 which is borderline billon. I'd say 30% silver would certainly benefit from surface enhancement but that's not to say it would not before that. This is a question to ask a metallurgist, not me. Another matter is the chart covers AR/CU alloy but coins were never just two metals. It would make a difference whether the 80% silver coins had a mix of other metals that would add or subtract hardness. I know there are coin collector type people into this sort of question since there is a Yahoo group on metal. I am a member but do not read every post. [url]https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/numismet/info[/url][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Doug's 2015 $5 to $100 list
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...