Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;AWORDCREATED, post: 1767961, member: 52245&quot;]I agree with Collect89 better photo&#039;s would help.&nbsp; Perhaps you could make that happen sometime.&nbsp; I&#039;d sure like to have a good look at it.&nbsp; i understand that last part, and I am but a noob.&nbsp; The strange rotation threw up a flag for me.&nbsp;&nbsp; I was suggesting that if a mint worker intentionally made this coin, it wouldn&#039;t be surprising to find him mucking up the rotation also.&nbsp; Not to imply that Nancy is a coin maker&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>When you say ridges do you mean rim raised against the field or the reeding on the edge? That would mean the coin is at least a little smaller than a cent.&nbsp; How does it compare to a cent in diameter, and to a dime and cent in thickness?&nbsp; All you need do for that is lay some normal coins out next to it and have a look.</p><p><br /></p><p>Can you confirm the rotation - which if any is correct and which has the rotation error?&nbsp; At least one has to have the error for the numbers I cited to not be equal.&nbsp; I based them off the blurry photos but they should be close.&nbsp; For example&nbsp; Redwin&#039;s coin has equal rotation offset (as it should) - best I can tell.</p><p><br /></p><p>I also agree that you should have it graded and attributed to know better the value and validity.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in