Yes, looks like a nice example. I like these coins that show evidence of ancient flan production, such as this one where the casting sprue has been broken off, taking a piece of flan with it.
It's nice to know my belief that the coin looks legitimate (which opinion I would not have offered, of course) is supported by those who know.
Given the position of the fibula on his cuirass, it seems like he is looking the wrong way. Interesting.
Looks good and nice to me (but... what a werde neck!!!) BTW... Happy Halloween! / Oidhche Shamhna shona dhut I had to do it!
I have read before that the "small figure may represent a barbarian child." However, on this example the small figure has a beard and as far as I know even barbarian children didn't have beards. So this should establish the small figure on the "Hut" type coins as an adult barbarian.
good point, maybe a new variant with an adult... https://www.cointalk.com/threads/fel-temp-reparatio-hut-type.259251/
It has been described as a child due to the scale difference but realistic scale might well have nothing to do with it and be more to do with an exaggeration of power of the emperor over the barbarian.
