Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mrbadexample, post: 3321225, member: 100740&quot;]I don&#039;t think it&#039;s too much to believe that Krause is wrong, and that it doesn&#039;t exist. There are plenty of mistakes in the catalogue. That&#039;s not a criticism: given the magnitude of their undertaking it is inevitable that some mistakes will creep in. As an example, take the Guernsey 4 doubles 1864/54. It doesn&#039;t exist, but is listed. Given the numbers involved, if it existed then it would be known. Pridmore doesn&#039;t list it. McCammon doesn&#039;t list it. There is no shred of evidence other than one line in a catalogue.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]880366[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Given the scope of the internet, if the 1926 Zog existed then somewhere there would be some trace. A picture, a record of sale, something. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie5" alt=":confused:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in