Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Does anyone recognize this 'Reverse'?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2492106, member: 19463"]That's pretty rough just because the coins are 99.9% cheap and unpopular with investors. Are there any investment grade Claudius ants? There are some nice golds. Certainly you will not get rich on Claudius II and as long as the majority of people who own ancient coins are more interested in their cash appreciation potential there might be a chance for someone out there to make a real contribution to numismatic science studying them. I'm not sure that there is a real opportunity in the study of barbarous copies of this period. I may be short sighted but fail to see how we can ever prove anything organizing the unofficial coins. They have such a range from what probably fools experts into believing they are official to those identifiable by the blind. We usually see barbarous coins listed as copying a specific ruler or type but there are some that are hard to accept as even copying something we have seen before. They are fun but I wouldn't pin my hopes of a doctoral candidacy on figuring them out. Who does this copy?</p><p>[ATTACH=full]527574[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>A point: Not all copies of Roman coins were used in places where the emperors defined legality. Saying they were tolerated implies a level of control far beyond what I suspect existed in much of the regions surrounding the limits of the Empire.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2492106, member: 19463"]That's pretty rough just because the coins are 99.9% cheap and unpopular with investors. Are there any investment grade Claudius ants? There are some nice golds. Certainly you will not get rich on Claudius II and as long as the majority of people who own ancient coins are more interested in their cash appreciation potential there might be a chance for someone out there to make a real contribution to numismatic science studying them. I'm not sure that there is a real opportunity in the study of barbarous copies of this period. I may be short sighted but fail to see how we can ever prove anything organizing the unofficial coins. They have such a range from what probably fools experts into believing they are official to those identifiable by the blind. We usually see barbarous coins listed as copying a specific ruler or type but there are some that are hard to accept as even copying something we have seen before. They are fun but I wouldn't pin my hopes of a doctoral candidacy on figuring them out. Who does this copy? [ATTACH=full]527574[/ATTACH] A point: Not all copies of Roman coins were used in places where the emperors defined legality. Saying they were tolerated implies a level of control far beyond what I suspect existed in much of the regions surrounding the limits of the Empire.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Does anyone recognize this 'Reverse'?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...