Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Does anyone actually use RIC?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 8179417, member: 110350"]Great summary; thanks. I think that if one collects primarily denarii and not so much bronze coins, one should definitely consider Roman Silver Coins [RSC] Vol. II, Tiberius to Commodus (Seaby, 3d ed. 1979). The numbering system is based on Cohen (just as the numbering system in RSC I for Roman Republican coins is based on Babelon), so for catalogs referencing Cohen numbers that makes it easy to find particular coins. As does the fact that the coins are arranged alphabetically by reverse inscription, and by design within the various inscriptions. Also, it's much more comprehensive in listing every conceivable variation of each coin (with respect to obverse portraits, legends, etc.) than either RIC or RCV. (I find that Sear RCV II is considerably less comprehensive than the later, post-284 AD volumes: it's missing a substantial percentage of the coins of Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius, etc.)</p><p><br /></p><p>Plus, individual volumes of RSC are much less expensive than volumes of RIC or RCV: there are several copies for sale on Amazon for less than $30. But make sure you're buying the 3rd edition, because copies of the first two are also still floating around on the Internet.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 8179417, member: 110350"]Great summary; thanks. I think that if one collects primarily denarii and not so much bronze coins, one should definitely consider Roman Silver Coins [RSC] Vol. II, Tiberius to Commodus (Seaby, 3d ed. 1979). The numbering system is based on Cohen (just as the numbering system in RSC I for Roman Republican coins is based on Babelon), so for catalogs referencing Cohen numbers that makes it easy to find particular coins. As does the fact that the coins are arranged alphabetically by reverse inscription, and by design within the various inscriptions. Also, it's much more comprehensive in listing every conceivable variation of each coin (with respect to obverse portraits, legends, etc.) than either RIC or RCV. (I find that Sear RCV II is considerably less comprehensive than the later, post-284 AD volumes: it's missing a substantial percentage of the coins of Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius, etc.) Plus, individual volumes of RSC are much less expensive than volumes of RIC or RCV: there are several copies for sale on Amazon for less than $30. But make sure you're buying the 3rd edition, because copies of the first two are also still floating around on the Internet.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Does anyone actually use RIC?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...