Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Does anyone actually use RIC?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 8174369, member: 19463"]Just an opinion: Those interested in this subject would be better advised to avoid those books and read Martin's posts on Coin Talk, Barry Murphy's old Septimius pages and, perhaps, the recently uploaded coins from the British Museum collection. I say 'perhaps' because the BM chose to use a format that makes it very hard to use but they have some nice coins not as well presented as the other references mentioned. </p><p><br /></p><p>Regarding another controversial thread: There is a major difference between a 'serious' resource and one that demands to be take too seriously. I am an amateur. That word means that I love my subject enough to do/study/post without considering whether I can make a buck on the process or whether the coins involved have a high enough market value to be worth my time. Read everyone; believe only after critical evaluation. For the Eastern Severans, the best paper resource is a stack of old sale catalogs and a thin pamphlet by Roger Bickford-Smith whose untimely death prevented what would have been quite some book had he been allowed to work these last 25 years. </p><p><br /></p><p>Does anyone have an opinion on errors I made in my post here? </p><p><a href="https://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/mintalex.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/mintalex.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/mintalex.html</a> </p><p><br /></p><p>Has anyone done anything remotely professional regarding relative issue dates or mint details of this series?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 8174369, member: 19463"]Just an opinion: Those interested in this subject would be better advised to avoid those books and read Martin's posts on Coin Talk, Barry Murphy's old Septimius pages and, perhaps, the recently uploaded coins from the British Museum collection. I say 'perhaps' because the BM chose to use a format that makes it very hard to use but they have some nice coins not as well presented as the other references mentioned. Regarding another controversial thread: There is a major difference between a 'serious' resource and one that demands to be take too seriously. I am an amateur. That word means that I love my subject enough to do/study/post without considering whether I can make a buck on the process or whether the coins involved have a high enough market value to be worth my time. Read everyone; believe only after critical evaluation. For the Eastern Severans, the best paper resource is a stack of old sale catalogs and a thin pamphlet by Roger Bickford-Smith whose untimely death prevented what would have been quite some book had he been allowed to work these last 25 years. Does anyone have an opinion on errors I made in my post here? [URL]https://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/mintalex.html[/URL] Has anyone done anything remotely professional regarding relative issue dates or mint details of this series?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Does anyone actually use RIC?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...