Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;toned_morgan, post: 8625786, member: 97258&quot;]I compared the images to PCGS photos, the second one is more suspicious. The serifs on the end of the 3 are very wide, similar to the 8&#039;s serifs, while the serifs on the actual 3 are thin. The first one you posted has thin serifs, and the three looks like the right shape and right placement, but it is struck over something, maybe looks like a 1882. It can&#039;t be 1880 because the 0 is too big, 1881, the 8&#039;s are bigger and less spread out, 82, the 8&#039;s are good, but 2 is a bit big, and 84, the 4 is connected to the 8, less spread out. All the others in the 80&#039;s have bigger 8 and the number are less spread out. So what it is struck over, I have no clue.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in