Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Do you think quality of silver is as good as in the older days??
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="NorthKorea, post: 1736694, member: 29643"]Given that the only "post-1964" 90% silver US coins are either commemorative or "silver set" issues, there shouldn't be wear on the modern coins. Speaking specifically to Morgan/Peace dollar issues, you have to also remember that many weren't in circulation for as long as their dates would seem to indicate. There are so many "hoard" examples of the coins that it wouldn't surprise me if some of the non-GSA coins were actually GSA auction coins that individuals chose to place into their Morgan albums or something similar.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you're talking about worn down coins (F8 or lower grades), then it's likely a result of the design elements of the coin, rather than the reasons you cited.</p><p><br /></p><p>Also, remember, that you're probably not comparing dollars to dollars.</p><p><br /></p><p>Barber coinage wears down nearly flat, and that's across pretty much all denominations. Those coins pre-date the coins that you would call "older days" and deteriorate readily.</p><p><br /></p><p>I don't know what to say on the Walkers, other than they made a TON of the short set ones. The 1942 Walker (which is likely the date you keep seeing "in general") had a whopping 47.8mm mintage.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="NorthKorea, post: 1736694, member: 29643"]Given that the only "post-1964" 90% silver US coins are either commemorative or "silver set" issues, there shouldn't be wear on the modern coins. Speaking specifically to Morgan/Peace dollar issues, you have to also remember that many weren't in circulation for as long as their dates would seem to indicate. There are so many "hoard" examples of the coins that it wouldn't surprise me if some of the non-GSA coins were actually GSA auction coins that individuals chose to place into their Morgan albums or something similar. If you're talking about worn down coins (F8 or lower grades), then it's likely a result of the design elements of the coin, rather than the reasons you cited. Also, remember, that you're probably not comparing dollars to dollars. Barber coinage wears down nearly flat, and that's across pretty much all denominations. Those coins pre-date the coins that you would call "older days" and deteriorate readily. I don't know what to say on the Walkers, other than they made a TON of the short set ones. The 1942 Walker (which is likely the date you keep seeing "in general") had a whopping 47.8mm mintage.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Do you think quality of silver is as good as in the older days??
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...