Do you Consider a Dipped Coin to Be Cleaned?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by physics-fan3.14, Feb 17, 2018.

?

Do you Consider a Dipped coin to be Cleaned?

  1. No

    4 vote(s)
    3.8%
  2. No, it has been conserved

    5 vote(s)
    4.7%
  3. Yes

    30 vote(s)
    28.3%
  4. Yes, but it is market acceptable

    16 vote(s)
    15.1%
  5. If done properly, a dipped coin is not a problem at all

    39 vote(s)
    36.8%
  6. I will never buy a dipped coin!

    5 vote(s)
    4.7%
  7. Dipping is a problem when it is improperly done

    24 vote(s)
    22.6%
  8. Dipping is a problem when it is done too much

    9 vote(s)
    8.5%
  9. Dipping is a problem when a coin starts to develop unattractive secondary toning

    7 vote(s)
    6.6%
  10. I've had enough Bourbon that I don't care

    10 vote(s)
    9.4%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Give the man the cigar ! As I have posted more times than I can count, toning is always, always, always - did I say always ? - dependent upon any of thousands of variables. And everybody, everywhere, has different variables. So of course there are going to be different outcomes and different rates for the progression of toning.

    But in any event, no matter what the variables, it doesn't mean that toning to some degree or another has not occurred. Every coin there is begins toning the instant it is made.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. atcarroll

    atcarroll Well-Known Member

    I have submitted coins that i personally have dipped, they came back with straight grades.
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  4. rmpsrpms

    rmpsrpms Lincoln Maniac

    A brave admission in this environment!
     
  5. Hommer

    Hommer Curator of Semi Precious Coinage

    So when they put "Details Corroded" on a label they are telling the truth but when a coin is toned and they don't add "Details Corroded", then they are lying?
     
  6. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title] Supporter

    At some point corrosion moves to where the coin is considered damaged. There are also different kinds of corrosion. Toning is oxidation and if a coin oxidizes too much they will details it.

    It’s just like coins that have been scrubbed. Sometimes a little bit of hair lining will pass because they decide the coin isn’t a problem. Severity is the key.
     
  7. Hommer

    Hommer Curator of Semi Precious Coinage

    Ask NGC if "Conserving" the Norweb coin was a good idea. Like I said before, dipping is erosion, plan and simple. If you put it back into the same environment, you have done nothing but hasten its demise. If it has been exposed to natural atmospheric conditions for it's entire life, it will survive on it's own and be much better for it. If it has been exposed to a very harsh environment, eroding the surface off isn't saving it, where removing it from that environment would be.
     
  8. 352sdeer

    352sdeer Collecting Lincoln cents for 50 years!

    Bingo. Winner winner chicken dinner. But alas no because the TPG Firms MUST keep up the mith that their cleaning service isn’t cleaning but conserving so they aren’t lying. Wink wink. Just chemically altering the surface of the coin by stripping the toned no, tarnished no, oxidized surface OFF OF THE COIN! Sounds like double talk to me.
    11D1B9AA-8D1D-4DFD-9D97-401993E4EE92.jpeg
    Reed and a bewildered Sparkles the Unicorn.
     
  9. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title] Supporter

    You are right. After dipping a coin the fresh surface is more reactive than the coin was before. So proper storage is key or long term you are worse off based on what I have read.

    You’re wrong. But I don’t know how to help you understand. That’s ok. You can be wrong.
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  10. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor

    Nathan401 and Pickin and Grinin like this.
  11. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    Thank you very much, Jim, and a belated thanks to @GDJMSP as well.

    I also hope they're of assistance to some involved in this discussion.
     
  12. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    First air conditioner was made in 1902. So before that, it was almost impossible to properly store coins. Of course, just because it was invented in 1902, doesn't mean it was widely used. I grew up in a home built in the early 1960's and it didn't have air conditioning until we had it installed in the early '70's.

    So without wide spread use of conditioned air, it was nearly impossible to properly store coins.

    I've read your posts in this thread and I agree with them. This post is meant to provide supporting data to your improper storage comments. Without the ability to remove moisture from the air, toning/corrosion would be difficult to prevent on coins.
     
  13. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Put them in a glass jar, put a cork in it, seal it with wax. The mass of air and humidity trapped in the bottle is tiny compared to the mass of the coins. Once anything reactive in the bottle combines with the coins, reactions stop.
     
  14. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor

    Jeff, you have the beginning of a folk song in the first sentence :)
     
    Nathan401 and juris klavins like this.
  15. Dougmeister

    Dougmeister Well-Known Member

    "Put 'em in a glass jar...
    Put a cork in it,
    Seal it with wax..."

     
    Jaelus likes this.
  16. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    I have noticed a lot of darker toned earlier circulated coins ie bust and early seated that come out of New England. And I mean from old estates not collections you get a lot of the almost black circulated cameo ones a lot of times and I always attributed it to the massive amount of wood and coal smoke in the winters the last 209 years and all the sulfur compounds in it just like antique weathervanes from eastern Massachusetts and any of the mill towns in Maine and New Hampshire will have a very heavy dark green copper verdigris patina compared to ones from more rural New England and upstate New York (I deal in antiques and specialize in Americana and folk art) and have had dozens of early weathervanes and have examined hundreds if not thousands
     
    Nathan401 and -jeffB like this.
  17. rmpsrpms

    rmpsrpms Lincoln Maniac

    That's the type of experience that can give you the ability to determine authenticity with high certainty.
     
  18. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    There was an even easier way - Ball Jars and or Mason Jars. They were manufactured for home canning purposes and first invented in 1858.

    As I have said before Jeff, I have never doubted that it was "possible" to protect coins, even long ago. The thing that matters is the probability of that happening. Did it ever happen ? I have no doubt at all that it happened ! I believe it is an absolute certainty that it did happen.

    But how many people do you think actually did that ? Coin collectors certainly would not have. In the first place they were few and far between. In the second place they didn't store their coins that way. In the 3rd place they never even considered trying to protect them because they never even thought about trying to protect them because they didn't see any reason to do so ! For centuries before that the single most common thing that coin collectors did, for those who didn't like the toning, was every once in a while they would take their coins out and polish them with rags and pieces of cloth. And a few would dip them. And yes the chemicals existed back then.

    All of this history combined is what makes it so very, very improbable that coins would be stored in canning jars. The one and only thing that existed at the time that would do the job.
     
  19. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor

    Cyanide , the dip of antiquity!
     
  20. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    So how do you protect the temperature of the jar with no air conditioning? The jar would get warm, wouldn't condensation form on the inside of the jar?
     
  21. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Sure, if you put them in damp or when the air was humid. But if you put them in dry, especially if you put them in during the winter when the air is cold and dry, there won't be enough moisture in the container to form condensation.
     
    Kentucky likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page