Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Owle, post: 1422618, member: 22004&quot;]You have a good shot with both IMO.&nbsp; Remember the 1928s usually don&#039;t have the eye appeal of some other dates; the grading services know exactly which dates have the best strikes, luster, or tend to have more bagginess.&nbsp; The 1927s tend to have above average eye appeal and according to Mr. Salzburg of NGC, PCGS tends to grade more of those 65 than NGC--I&#039;m just saying that in terms of grading philosophy and would reference the interview of Salzburg of NGC with Maurice Rosen available on the NGC site and elsewhere without copyright restrictions.</p><p><br /></p><p>Owle™<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in