Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Do the Research on Your Ancient Coins
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Al Kowsky, post: 8264487, member: 97383"]One of the most enjoyable & satisfying aspects' of collecting ancient coins is doing the <b>research </b>on them, not only after you acquire them but <u>before</u> you acquire them too <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />. The computer age has made this much easier than it used to be. There are so many websites with valuable info today that cost nothing to use & can be downloaded at no expense. Many computer savvy <b>CT </b>members & dealers have built impressive websites to share their collections & stock, & this has been beneficial to the growth of our hobby. I'd like to build a website too after getting a new computer & better software.</p><p><br /></p><p>Several years ago I won an interesting "sleeper" at auction that turned out to be a real challenge to attribute. I immediately recognized the obverse of this coin as a rare type.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1457959[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>SYRIA. Antioch. Philip II as Caesar (AD 247-249). BI Tetradrachm (26 mm, 6 h). NGC AU. AD 249. Prieur-. McAlee-, 1027A (eagle right).</b></p><p>Not satisfied with this attribution, I did an exhaustive search to find another example of this coin type with no luck. On March 15th I remembered that Richard McAlee wrote two supplements to his book: <b>The Coins of Roman Antioch, 2007; Supplement No. 1, 2010, & Supplement No. 2, 2020. </b>Much to my delight I found a coin in Supplement No. 2 that looked like my coin <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie101" alt=":woot:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />!</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1457962[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>ROMAN-SYRIA, Antioch. Philip II as Caesar, AD 244-249 (struck AD 247). Billon Tetradrachm: 11.54 gm, 27.07 mm, 6 h. McAlee 1021A. VCoins, Marc R. Breitsprecher, September 2018. Extremely Rare.</b></p><p>The photo in Supplement No. 2 was small & the details were difficult to discern <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie5" alt=":confused:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />. So I went to Marc's website hoping to find a better photo, & much to my surprise he still had the same coin for sale only it had been attributed as <b>Prieur 395 type (radiate) <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie12" alt="o_O" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />. </b>I sent Marc an email with the correct attribution & he admitted that he missed the publication of McAlee's Supplement No. 2, & did change the listing on his coin. As it turned out our coins are a double die match <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie57" alt=":jawdrop:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />!</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1457966[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1457967[/ATTACH]</p><p>The obverse of my coin has less die wear but the reverses look very close in regards to die wear. Marc wrote back to me that he also did a search for another example of this coin type but couldn't find another example. At this point in time, we have the only known examples of this coin type, & the label "Extremely Rare" is still justified <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie50" alt=":happy:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />. I've spent countless hours trying to attribute rare & unusual coins without success, this time the effort paid-off <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie6" alt=":cool:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />. If any <b>CT </b>member should stumble on another of this coin type, I'd be thankful if you would share that info with me <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie59" alt=":joyful:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Al Kowsky, post: 8264487, member: 97383"]One of the most enjoyable & satisfying aspects' of collecting ancient coins is doing the [B]research [/B]on them, not only after you acquire them but [U]before[/U] you acquire them too ;). The computer age has made this much easier than it used to be. There are so many websites with valuable info today that cost nothing to use & can be downloaded at no expense. Many computer savvy [B]CT [/B]members & dealers have built impressive websites to share their collections & stock, & this has been beneficial to the growth of our hobby. I'd like to build a website too after getting a new computer & better software. Several years ago I won an interesting "sleeper" at auction that turned out to be a real challenge to attribute. I immediately recognized the obverse of this coin as a rare type. [ATTACH=full]1457959[/ATTACH] [B]SYRIA. Antioch. Philip II as Caesar (AD 247-249). BI Tetradrachm (26 mm, 6 h). NGC AU. AD 249. Prieur-. McAlee-, 1027A (eagle right).[/B] Not satisfied with this attribution, I did an exhaustive search to find another example of this coin type with no luck. On March 15th I remembered that Richard McAlee wrote two supplements to his book: [B]The Coins of Roman Antioch, 2007; Supplement No. 1, 2010, & Supplement No. 2, 2020. [/B]Much to my delight I found a coin in Supplement No. 2 that looked like my coin :woot:! [ATTACH=full]1457962[/ATTACH] [B]ROMAN-SYRIA, Antioch. Philip II as Caesar, AD 244-249 (struck AD 247). Billon Tetradrachm: 11.54 gm, 27.07 mm, 6 h. McAlee 1021A. VCoins, Marc R. Breitsprecher, September 2018. Extremely Rare.[/B] The photo in Supplement No. 2 was small & the details were difficult to discern :confused:. So I went to Marc's website hoping to find a better photo, & much to my surprise he still had the same coin for sale only it had been attributed as [B]Prieur 395 type (radiate) o_O. [/B]I sent Marc an email with the correct attribution & he admitted that he missed the publication of McAlee's Supplement No. 2, & did change the listing on his coin. As it turned out our coins are a double die match :jawdrop:! [ATTACH=full]1457966[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1457967[/ATTACH] The obverse of my coin has less die wear but the reverses look very close in regards to die wear. Marc wrote back to me that he also did a search for another example of this coin type but couldn't find another example. At this point in time, we have the only known examples of this coin type, & the label "Extremely Rare" is still justified :happy:. I've spent countless hours trying to attribute rare & unusual coins without success, this time the effort paid-off :cool:. If any [B]CT [/B]member should stumble on another of this coin type, I'd be thankful if you would share that info with me :joyful:.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Do the Research on Your Ancient Coins
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...