Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;baseball21, post: 2479146, member: 76863&quot;]It would at the upper end or rarities where that matters the most.&nbsp; Theres a couple out there where collectors know the same coin is counted more than once in the combined populations.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>The problem is the amount of work it would take.&nbsp; Last 12 months PCGS shows just shy of 1300 cross overs.&nbsp; You basically have to pay someone to just do data input for a 1000 labels a month to send over with no real benefit to them.&nbsp; NGC would only have to send to PCGS but PCGS allows from any service so they would also have to track whose was what and where to send it ect.&nbsp; From a business standpoint they just won&#039;t see the benefit to the added cost.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>In all honesty the pops are so inflated in certain areas from crackout resubmissions I am not sure it would really make much of a difference in terms of increasing accuracy.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Most people just throw them away, some will send them back in. NGC offers a 50 cent credit per label to give an incentive to return them to help keep the population reports more accurate.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in