Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mhen, post: 766988, member: 22176&quot;]this theory of just being die chips makes sense as I examine close ups of these 9&#039;s, and i&#039;ve ran presses for&nbsp; many many years, and if the sharp edges of the 9 were worn down and not so sharp or small chips on the edges, the result would be 9&#039;s that look like this. Instead of being clean cut or pressed, it would push some metal in different directions. Due to a worn mark or chip. does that mean the whole Double punched theory is just made up and that they actually are just worn dies. that would change the whole collecting 9 over 8&#039;s of these coins. considering they would actually be just sloppy nines in many forms depending on where the worn marks or chips are located on the 9.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in